Evaluating Arguments in Text

Trace and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, distinguishing claims that are supported by reasons and evidence from claims that are not.

Share This Post

Standard: 6.RI.8 – Trace and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, distinguishing claims that are supported by reasons and evidence from claims that are not.

Grade level: Grade 6

Subject: English Language Arts

Domain: Reading: Informational Text

Teacher Overview

This standard focuses on students’ ability to critically evaluate arguments and claims in informational texts. It is crucial for developing critical thinking skills and for understanding how to discern credible information in a world full of varying sources. Students should be able to identify the main idea and supporting details in a text and distinguish between facts and opinions.

Students will be able to construct their own arguments and support them with credible evidence, and they will be adept at critically analyzing more complex texts across different subjects.

Misconception Icon

Common Misconception 1

Some students may think that all claims in a text are equally valid. This is incorrect because not all claims are supported by strong evidence. It is important to teach students to look for specific evidence that supports each claim.

Intervention Icon

Intervention 1

Use guided practice with texts that clearly differentiate between supported and unsupported claims. Highlight the evidence that supports each claim and discuss why it is credible.

Misconception Icon

Common Misconception 2

Students might believe that personal opinions or anecdotes are strong evidence. This is a misconception because strong evidence typically includes data, statistics, and expert testimony, not just personal stories.

Intervention Icon

Intervention 2

Provide clear examples of strong evidence, such as research studies or expert opinions, and compare these with personal anecdotes to illustrate the difference.

Prerequisite Knowledge

Students should have a foundational understanding of identifying the main idea and supporting details in a text, as well as basic comprehension of fact versus opinion.

Subsequent Knowledge

After mastering this standard, students will develop skills in constructing their own arguments and supporting them with evidence, as well as critically analyzing more complex texts across different subjects.

Instructional Activities

  • Group discussions evaluating the strength of claims in various texts
  • Writing assignments where students must support their arguments with evidence
  • Analyzing editorials or opinion pieces for supported and unsupported claims
  • Debates where students must use evidence to support their positions
  • Creating posters that distinguish between strong and weak evidence

Be proactive. Get updates

Join our mailing list to be the first to receive updates, examples, and event alerts!

More To Explore

Proactive Instruction

Textual Evidence Analysis

Cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.

Want to bring the Proactive Instruction Model to your school or district?

Contact us today for customized professional development!

Learn how we helped 100 top brands gain success.

Let's have a chat