Comparing Authors’ Perspectives

Analyze how two or more authors writing about the same topic shape their presentations of key information by emphasizing different evidence or advancing different interpretations of facts.

Share This Post

Standard: 7.RI.9 – Analyze how two or more authors writing about the same topic shape their presentations of key information by emphasizing different evidence or advancing different interpretations of facts.

Grade level: Grade 7

Subject: English Language Arts

Domain: Reading: Informational Text

Teacher Overview

This standard focuses on analyzing how different authors approach the same topic by emphasizing various pieces of evidence or offering different interpretations. Understanding this helps students develop critical thinking skills and appreciate multiple perspectives, which are essential for higher-level reading and writing. Students should be able to identify the main idea and supporting details in a text, understand basic text structures (e.g., cause/effect, compare/contrast), and have experience with summarizing informational texts.

After mastering this standard, students will be able to critically evaluate the credibility of sources, synthesize information from multiple texts, and develop well-supported arguments based on their analysis.

Misconception Icon

Common Misconception 1

Students may believe that all authors present information in the same way. This misconception arises because students often encounter texts in isolation and may not have had the opportunity to compare different authors’ approaches.

Intervention Icon

Intervention 1

Introduce students to diverse writing styles and provide examples of different authors presenting the same topic in various ways. Encourage them to note differences and discuss why authors might choose to present information differently.

Misconception Icon

Common Misconception 2

Students might think that differing interpretations mean one author is incorrect. This misconception can occur because students are used to looking for ‘right’ answers and may not understand that multiple valid perspectives can exist.

Intervention Icon

Intervention 2

Teach students that multiple interpretations can coexist and that different authors may highlight different evidence to support their viewpoints. Use case studies or examples where multiple interpretations are valid and discuss the value of each perspective.

Prerequisite Knowledge

Students should be able to identify the main idea and supporting details in a text, understand basic text structures (e.g., cause/effect, compare/contrast), and have experience with summarizing informational texts.

Subsequent Knowledge

After mastering this standard, students will be able to critically evaluate the credibility of sources, synthesize information from multiple texts, and develop well-supported arguments based on their analysis.

Instructional Activities

  • Compare and contrast two articles on the same current event.
  • Analyze different historical accounts of a significant event.
  • Evaluate scientific reports from different sources on the same study.
  • Read multiple biographies of the same historical figure and discuss the differences.
  • Review different reviews of the same book or movie and identify the varying perspectives.

Be proactive. Get updates

Join our mailing list to be the first to receive updates, examples, and event alerts!

More To Explore

Proactive Instruction

Textual Evidence Analysis

Cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.

Want to bring the Proactive Instruction Model to your school or district?

Contact us today for customized professional development!

Learn how we helped 100 top brands gain success.

Let's have a chat