Analyzing Writing in History and Science

(See note; not applicable as a separate requirement)

Share This Post

Standard: 9-10.WHST.3 – (See note; not applicable as a separate requirement)

Grade level: Grade 9-10

Subject: English Language Arts

Domain: Writing: History, Science & Technical Subjects

Teacher Overview

This standard focuses on developing students’ skills in writing for history, science, and technical subjects. It is crucial as it helps students learn to communicate complex ideas clearly and effectively, which is essential for success in both academic and real-world settings. Students should be familiar with basic research methods, understand the difference between primary and secondary sources, and possess foundational writing skills.

After mastering this standard, students will be able to conduct advanced research, synthesize information from various sources, and write well-supported arguments and analyses, preparing them for higher-level academic work and professional communication.

Misconception Icon

Common Misconception 1

Students may believe that writing for history and science is the same as writing for English literature. This is incorrect because writing for history and science often requires a more structured, evidence-based approach, whereas literary writing can be more interpretive and creative.

Intervention Icon

Intervention 1

Provide examples of writing from different disciplines and engage students in comparative analysis to highlight differences in structure, purpose, and style.

Misconception Icon

Common Misconception 2

Students might think that technical writing does not require creativity or critical thinking. This misconception overlooks the fact that effective technical writing often involves presenting complex information in an engaging and accessible way.

Intervention Icon

Intervention 2

Showcase examples of technical writing that are both informative and engaging, and encourage students to practice writing that requires both clarity and creativity.

Prerequisite Knowledge

Students should have a basic understanding of research methods, the ability to distinguish between primary and secondary sources, and foundational writing skills including constructing clear and coherent sentences and paragraphs.

Subsequent Knowledge

Students will develop advanced research skills, the ability to synthesize information from multiple sources, and the capability to construct well-supported arguments and analyses in writing.

Instructional Activities

  • Comparative analysis of historical documents
  • Writing lab reports based on scientific experiments
  • Creating technical manuals or guides
  • Developing research papers on interdisciplinary topics

Be proactive. Get updates

Join our mailing list to be the first to receive updates, examples, and event alerts!

More To Explore

Proactive Instruction

Textual Evidence Analysis

Cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.

Want to bring the Proactive Instruction Model to your school or district?

Contact us today for customized professional development!

Learn how we helped 100 top brands gain success.

Let's have a chat