Evaluating Arguments and Evidence

Delineate a speaker's argument and specific claims, evaluating the soundness of the reasoning and the relevance and sufficiency of the evidence.

Share This Post

Standard: 7.SL.3 – Delineate a speaker’s argument and specific claims, evaluating the soundness of the reasoning and the relevance and sufficiency of the evidence.

Grade level: Grade 7

Subject: English Language Arts

Domain: Speaking & Listening

Teacher Overview

This standard focuses on helping students critically evaluate arguments and the evidence presented to support them. It is crucial for developing critical thinking skills, which are essential for academic success and informed citizenship. Students should be comfortable identifying main ideas and supporting details in texts and have some experience with critical thinking exercises.

Mastering this standard will prepare students to construct their own well-reasoned arguments and engage in higher-level discussions and debates.

Misconception Icon

Common Misconception 1

One common misconception is that all evidence is equally valid. Students may not understand that some evidence is stronger and more relevant than others.

Intervention Icon

Intervention 1

Use examples and non-examples to illustrate strong versus weak evidence. Have students work in pairs or groups to evaluate different pieces of evidence.

Misconception Icon

Common Misconception 2

Another misconception is that a convincing argument is always logically sound. Students may be swayed by persuasive language without critically evaluating the logic.

Intervention Icon

Intervention 2

Introduce logical fallacies and use interactive activities like fallacy bingo or structured debates to help students identify and avoid these pitfalls.

Prerequisite Knowledge

Students should already have a basic understanding of identifying main ideas and supporting details in a text, as well as some experience with critical thinking and logical reasoning.

Subsequent Knowledge

After mastering this standard, students will be able to construct their own arguments more effectively, using sound reasoning and relevant evidence. They will also be better prepared to engage in higher-level discussions and debates.

Instructional Activities

  • Analyze political speeches for logical consistency
  • Evaluate advertisements for valid claims
  • Assess the credibility of news sources
  • Debate in class on current events
  • Review courtroom arguments in mock trials

Be proactive. Get updates

Join our mailing list to be the first to receive updates, examples, and event alerts!

More To Explore

Proactive Instruction

Textual Evidence Analysis

Cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.

Want to bring the Proactive Instruction Model to your school or district?

Contact us today for customized professional development!

Learn how we helped 100 top brands gain success.

Let's have a chat