Author’s Purpose in Scientific Texts

Analyze the author's purpose in providing an explanation, describing a procedure, or discussing an experiment in a text, identifying important issues that remain unresolved.

Share This Post

Standard: 11-12.RST.6 – Analyze the author’s purpose in providing an explanation, describing a procedure, or discussing an experiment in a text, identifying important issues that remain unresolved.

Grade level: Grade 11-12

Subject: English Language Arts

Domain: Science & Technical Subjects

Teacher Overview

This standard focuses on analyzing the author’s purpose in scientific and technical texts, specifically in explaining, describing procedures, or discussing experiments. Understanding the author’s intent and identifying unresolved issues are crucial skills for students, as they prepare for higher education and careers in scientific fields. Students should be comfortable with basic analytical reading skills, familiar with scientific methodologies, and experienced in identifying main ideas and supporting details in texts.

After mastering this standard, students will be able to critically evaluate scientific literature, understand the significance of unresolved issues, and apply these skills in higher education and professional settings.

Misconception Icon

Common Misconception 1

A common misconception is that all parts of a scientific text are equally important. This is incorrect because scientific texts often contain both essential information and supplementary details. Understanding this distinction helps in focusing on the most critical aspects of the text.

Intervention Icon

Intervention 1

One effective intervention is to use structured analysis exercises where students practice distinguishing between key components and supplementary information in various scientific texts.

Misconception Icon

Common Misconception 2

Another misconception is that unresolved issues in a text indicate poor research. This is not true; unresolved issues often highlight areas for further research and are a natural part of the scientific process.

Intervention Icon

Intervention 2

To address this, explain that unresolved issues can indicate the boundaries of current knowledge and suggest directions for future research. Use examples from actual scientific literature to illustrate this point.

Prerequisite Knowledge

Students should have a foundational understanding of basic analytical reading skills, familiarity with scientific methodologies, and experience with identifying main ideas and supporting details in texts.

Subsequent Knowledge

Students will develop advanced critical thinking skills, the ability to critique scientific literature, and an enhanced understanding of the interplay between scientific research and its presentation.

Instructional Activities

  • Group discussions analyzing different scientific texts
  • Writing assignments critiquing the author’s purpose
  • Role-playing exercises simulating scientific debates
  • Creating presentations on unresolved issues in scientific studies
  • Conducting peer reviews of scientific reports

Be proactive. Get updates

Join our mailing list to be the first to receive updates, examples, and event alerts!

More To Explore

Proactive Instruction

Textual Evidence Analysis

Cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.

Want to bring the Proactive Instruction Model to your school or district?

Contact us today for customized professional development!

Learn how we helped 100 top brands gain success.

Let's have a chat