Critical Analysis of Historical Texts

Evaluate an author's premises, claims, and evidence by corroborating or challenging them with other information.

Share This Post

Standard: 11-12.RH.8 – Evaluate an author’s premises, claims, and evidence by corroborating or challenging them with other information.

Grade level: Grade 11-12

Subject: English Language Arts

Domain: History/Social Studies

Teacher Overview

This standard focuses on developing students’ critical thinking skills by teaching them how to evaluate an author’s premises, claims, and evidence. This is crucial for their ability to engage with historical and social studies texts at a higher level, fostering a deeper understanding of the subject matter and preparing them for college-level analysis. Students should already be able to identify an author’s main argument and supporting evidence. They should understand basic concepts of bias, perspective, and credibility.

After mastering this standard, students will be able to independently evaluate complex texts, construct well-supported arguments, and engage in sophisticated discussions about the reliability and validity of various sources.

Misconception Icon

Common Misconception 1

One common misconception is that all sources are equally credible. This is incorrect because sources vary widely in reliability based on factors such as the author’s expertise, the publication’s reputation, and the quality of the evidence presented.

Intervention Icon

Intervention 1

To address this, teach students to evaluate the credibility of sources by examining the author’s background, the publication’s reputation, and the evidence presented.

Misconception Icon

Common Misconception 2

Another misconception is that challenging an author’s claims means dismissing them entirely. This is incorrect because critical engagement involves questioning and corroborating information, not just rejecting it.

Intervention Icon

Intervention 2

Encourage students to critically engage with texts by questioning and corroborating information rather than outright rejecting it.

Prerequisite Knowledge

Students should have a basic understanding of how to identify an author’s main argument and supporting evidence. They should also be familiar with the concepts of bias, perspective, and credibility in texts.

Subsequent Knowledge

After mastering this standard, students will be able to independently evaluate complex texts, construct well-supported arguments, and engage in sophisticated discussions about the reliability and validity of various sources.

Instructional Activities

  • Group discussions analyzing different historical texts
  • Debates on the credibility of various sources
  • Research projects evaluating the evidence in historical arguments
  • Peer reviews of written analyses
  • Role-playing exercises where students defend or challenge historical claims

Be proactive. Get updates

Join our mailing list to be the first to receive updates, examples, and event alerts!

More To Explore

Proactive Instruction

Textual Evidence Analysis

Cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.

Want to bring the Proactive Instruction Model to your school or district?

Contact us today for customized professional development!

Learn how we helped 100 top brands gain success.

Let's have a chat