Standard: 11-12.W.9b – Apply grades 11-12 Reading standards to literary nonfiction (e.g., ‘Delineate and evaluate the reasoning in seminal U.S. texts, including the application of constitutional principles and use of legal reasoning [e.g., in U.S. Supreme Court Case majority opinions and dissents] and the premises, purposes, and arguments in works of public advocacy [e.g., The Federalist, presidential addresses]’).
Grade level: Grade 11-12
Subject: English Language Arts
Domain: Writing
Teacher Overview
This standard emphasizes the importance of applying advanced reading skills to understand and evaluate literary nonfiction, particularly seminal U.S. texts. It is crucial for students to engage with these texts to develop a nuanced understanding of American history, legal principles, and rhetorical strategies. Students should be familiar with constitutional principles, key historical documents, and basic critical reading and analysis skills.
After mastering this standard, students will be able to critically evaluate complex arguments and reasoning in various texts, enhancing their analytical skills and understanding of legal and rhetorical principles.
Common Misconception 1
A common misconception is that historical texts are purely factual. This is incorrect because many historical texts use rhetorical devices and persuasive language to convey a particular viewpoint or argument.
Intervention 1
To address this misconception, use annotated examples to teach students how to identify rhetorical devices and persuasive language in historical texts, highlighting bias and argumentation.
Common Misconception 2
Another misconception is that legal reasoning is only relevant in legal contexts. This is incorrect because legal reasoning can be found in various forms of writing, including public advocacy and political speeches.
Intervention 2
Provide examples of legal reasoning in different contexts to demonstrate its broader relevance, helping students understand its application beyond legal texts.
Prerequisite Knowledge
Students should have a basic understanding of constitutional principles, familiarity with key U.S. historical documents, and foundational skills in critical reading and analysis.
Subsequent Knowledge
Students will develop advanced critical thinking skills, enhanced ability to construct and deconstruct arguments, and a deeper understanding of legal and rhetorical reasoning in historical and contemporary contexts.
Instructional Activities
- Analyze excerpts from U.S. Supreme Court case opinions
- Evaluate arguments in The Federalist Papers
- Critique rhetorical strategies in presidential addresses
- Discuss the application of constitutional principles in historical texts
