Argumentative Writing in Disciplines

Develop claim(s) and counterclaims fairly and thoroughly, supplying the most relevant data and evidence for each while pointing out the strengths and limitations of both claim(s) and counterclaims in a discipline-appropriate form that anticipates the audience's knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases.

Share This Post

Standard: 11-12.WHST.1b – Develop claim(s) and counterclaims fairly and thoroughly, supplying the most relevant data and evidence for each while pointing out the strengths and limitations of both claim(s) and counterclaims in a discipline-appropriate form that anticipates the audience’s knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases.

Grade level: Grade 11-12

Subject: English Language Arts

Domain: Writing: History, Science & Technical Subjects

Teacher Overview

This standard emphasizes the importance of developing well-rounded arguments by considering both claims and counterclaims. It is crucial for students to learn how to support their arguments with relevant data and evidence, while also recognizing the strengths and limitations of their own and opposing viewpoints. This skill is essential for academic and real-world contexts where critical thinking and effective communication are valued. Students should have a basic understanding of how to construct an argument, including making claims and providing evidence. They should also be familiar with critical thinking principles.

After mastering this standard, students will be able to engage in more sophisticated argumentative writing, including the ability to critique and improve their own and others’ arguments. This prepares them for college-level writing and professional communication.

Misconception Icon

Common Misconception 1

One common misconception is that presenting only their own claims is sufficient. This is incorrect because a well-rounded argument must consider and address counterclaims to be credible and persuasive.

Intervention Icon

Intervention 1

An effective intervention is to encourage students to research and present counterclaims. Peer review sessions can help identify and discuss these counterclaims, fostering a more balanced argument.

Misconception Icon

Common Misconception 2

Another misconception is that all evidence is equally valid. This is incorrect because the credibility and relevance of evidence can vary significantly, affecting the strength of the argument.

Intervention Icon

Intervention 2

To address this, teach students to evaluate the credibility and relevance of their sources. Use examples of strong and weak evidence to illustrate the differences, helping students to discern the quality of their evidence.

Prerequisite Knowledge

Students should have a foundational understanding of constructing basic arguments, including making claims and providing evidence. They should also be familiar with the basic principles of critical thinking and analysis.

Subsequent Knowledge

After mastering this standard, students will be able to engage in more sophisticated argumentative writing, including the ability to critique and improve their own and others’ arguments. They will also be prepared for college-level writing and professional communication.

Instructional Activities

  • Class debates on historical events
  • Writing scientific research papers
  • Creating technical project proposals
  • Analyzing and writing policy essays

Be proactive. Get updates

Join our mailing list to be the first to receive updates, examples, and event alerts!

More To Explore

Proactive Instruction

Textual Evidence Analysis

Cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.

Want to bring the Proactive Instruction Model to your school or district?

Contact us today for customized professional development!

Learn how we helped 100 top brands gain success.

Let's have a chat