Evaluating Speaker’s Arguments

Evaluate a speaker's point of view, reasoning, and use of evidence and rhetoric, identifying any fallacious reasoning or exaggerated or distorted evidence.

Share This Post

Standard: 9-10.SL.3 – Evaluate a speaker’s point of view, reasoning, and use of evidence and rhetoric, identifying any fallacious reasoning or exaggerated or distorted evidence.

Grade level: Grade 9-10

Subject: English Language Arts

Domain: Speaking & Listening

Teacher Overview

This standard emphasizes the importance of critical listening skills in evaluating a speaker’s argument. It is crucial for students to discern the quality of reasoning and evidence presented, as well as to identify any logical fallacies or distortions. This skill is fundamental in fostering informed and critical thinkers who can navigate a world filled with diverse perspectives and information sources. Students should have a foundational understanding of logical reasoning, types of evidence, and rhetorical devices. They should also be able to listen to and summarize spoken texts accurately.

Mastering this standard will enable students to engage more critically with spoken and written texts. They will be better equipped to participate in debates, write persuasive essays, and analyze media content critically, which are essential skills for academic success and informed citizenship.

Misconception Icon

Common Misconception 1

A common misconception is that all evidence presented by a speaker is equally credible. This is incorrect because different types of evidence have varying levels of reliability and validity. For instance, anecdotal evidence is often less reliable than statistical data.

Intervention Icon

Intervention 1

An effective intervention is to provide students with examples of different types of evidence and guide them in evaluating the credibility of each. This can be done through activities like comparing anecdotal stories to statistical reports on the same topic.

Misconception Icon

Common Misconception 2

Another misconception is that persuasive language always indicates a strong argument. This is not true because rhetorical devices can be used to make weak arguments appear stronger than they are. Students need to learn to look beyond the persuasive language and evaluate the actual content of the argument.

Intervention Icon

Intervention 2

To address this, teachers can use examples of speeches or advertisements that use rhetorical devices. Students can be tasked with identifying these devices and discussing whether they contribute to a logically sound argument.

Prerequisite Knowledge

Students should understand basic concepts of logical reasoning, types of evidence, and rhetorical devices. They should also have experience in listening to and summarizing spoken texts.

Subsequent Knowledge

After mastering this standard, students will be able to engage more critically with spoken and written texts, enhancing their ability to participate in debates, write persuasive essays, and analyze media critically.

Instructional Activities

  • Conducting debates on current events and evaluating arguments
  • Analyzing political speeches for logical fallacies and rhetorical devices
  • Creating presentations critiquing advertisements
  • Writing essays evaluating the credibility of news sources

Be proactive. Get updates

Join our mailing list to be the first to receive updates, examples, and event alerts!

More To Explore

Proactive Instruction

Textual Evidence Analysis

Cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.

Want to bring the Proactive Instruction Model to your school or district?

Contact us today for customized professional development!

Learn how we helped 100 top brands gain success.

Let's have a chat